The UN and ASEAN Collide Over the Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute

More than one year after gunfire first broke out along the Preah Vihear temple complex, specifically on May 28, 2025, the Thai-Cambodian border dispute is back in the headlines through an unlikely channel: a UN human rights mandate. On 31 July 2026, Tom Andrews, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, closed his first official mission to the country with an end of mission statement that devoted several passages to the border conflict, including a call on both governments to allow the safe return of displaced civilians. Bangkok rejected it within 24 hours, and the exchange escalated over the following week into a formal diplomatic note to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Southeast Asia’s Fourth Swing: the ISEAS 2026 Survey and Strategic Autonomy Under Strain  

China vs the US Since 2019, the State of Southeast Asia survey published annually by the ASEAN Studies Centre at the ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute has become the region’s “leading assessment of regional sentiment among policymakers, business leaders, and academics across Southeast Asia.” This article analyses its eighth edition, released on April 7, 2026, surveyed 2,008 respondents across all eleven ASEAN member states, including Timor-Leste for the first time following its October 2025 accession, fielded between January 5 and February 20, 2026.

The Next Hormuz: Strait of Malacca, Asia’s Unspoken Energy Risk 

On 28 February 2026, the US and Israel launched a joint military offensive against Iran. Within days, the Strait of Hormuz, where roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, was effectively closed. The lesson that followed was not just about the Middle East. It was about an energy chokepoint closer to East and Southeast Asia, the Strait of Malacca, one that is perhaps more consequential than the Strait of Hormuz.

What the US-China Summit Means for Businesses in Southeast Asia

When US President Donald Trump boarded Air Force One out of Beijing, China, on May 15, he left behind talk of “fantastic trade deals.” Across Southeast Asia, the reaction was rather more nuanced, not because this “détente”was unwelcomed, but because its implications for the region’s economic architecture are considerably more complicated than the headline numbers suggest.